- Founded in 2016 for fighting cyber-attacks and working with EU countries as far as the Mediterranean countries, without military action
- The Finnish government also says The European External Action Service and NATO will not become members
- The center to be set up would study and analyze hybrid threats
- 2017 President Niinistö being polite and friendly towards Russia
- Trump on Hybrid CoE: “Very soon we will be with you, believe me”
- The EU and NATO have teamed up in Europe’s far north to fight hybrid threats from “tweets to tanks.”
- 2018: Russia mentioned as the main hybrid threat
- “We are building a large network to create counterforce and reduce future conflict potential,”
- The Russophobia starts to escalate, Atlantic Council, social media accounts mentioned
- The Establishment is creating fear and uncertainty by keeping up the discussion of some “others” doing “hybrid influencing”
- It has been considered if NATO should add a core task to its mission: Ranging from cyber to disinformation and climate change, hybrid threats
- The interference or fraud has never been shown and proven to the people of the World by the Mainstream Media
- Dr. Shivas historical lawsuit from 2020 proved it
- When you change things slowly, people get used to the idea and there won’t be massive movements on the streets
- The idea of there are state and non-state actors conduct influence activities
- Hybrid influencing is just opinions. People have the right to talk about their opinions
- People’s opinions are available to other people, masses of people because of the internet
The foundations for the Hybrid Center were laid by EU defense ministers in September 2016. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg was also present at the meeting.
The Finnish media presented the original idea as fighting cyber-attacks and working with EU countries as far as the Mediterranean countries, without military action.
The range of means can include, for example, cyber-attacks or disinformation.
Defense minister Jussi Niinistö (ps.) presented plans for setting up the center to be set up would study and analyze hybrid threats. –27.9.2016 YLE NEWS
USA donated 0.5 million dollars to the Hybrid Center.
Niinistö is saying we must take Russia very seriously, avoid inflating the threats. He has been struck by the level of alarmism in our debates concerning the threat posed by the Russians.
There’s still some respect for Russia and will to get along as before in 2017, at least in what we were told by the Mainstream Media.
President Niinistö also stated that Finland is a producer and not a consumer of security. That makes Finland look so innocent.
The purpose of the Hybrid Center is in dialogue, claims Finnish Government Communications Department in 2017
“The Centre will engage in strategic level dialogue, research, training, and consultations. It will also conduct practical training exercises aiming to improve readiness to counter hybrid threats. The purpose of the Centre is to raise awareness of hybrid threats and societies’ vulnerabilities that can be exploited in hybrid operations. The aim is also to help foster the resilience of societies”.
The Finnish government also says The European External Action Service and NATO will not become members
“President Donald Trump highlighted Finland’s expertise in his speech.
“Finland is a leading expert in cyber security. We should call you soon. You do a fantastic job in cybersecurity – I congratulate you”, Trump gushed during a news conference at the White House on August 28th, 2017.
“Very soon we will be with you, believe me,” Trump continued.
The president of the United States also specifically mentioned the establishment of a European Centre of hybrid knowledge in Helsinki.” -ILTASANOMAT
Trump says USA is just a partner in 2017.
2018: Russia mentioned as the main hybrid threat
“We don’t focus on things that are already being done elsewhere mysterious hybrid center mulls countermeasures to hybrid threats”
“Relations between East and West have become strained to the limit. In this house in Helsinki, we are looking for ways to counter the threat posed by Russia.” says Hanna Smith in -Suomen kuvalehti- 20.4.2018
“Finland has not commissioned the study from the European Centre for hybrid expertise, but it will be made available to all member states from Europe to the United States, says Jukka Savolainen.”
“We are building a large network to create counterforce and reduce future conflict potential,” Smith says.
They haven’t been successful in reducing future conflicts, that was not the goal.
Von Loringhoven: “NATO Deputy Secretary-General in Helsinki: Russia is leading hybrid threat – Finland’s experience is interesting.”
It surely is interesting. Finland is right next to Russia with 1300 kilometers of mutual border and history. It’s like having Russia set up something in Mexico. Texas – Mexico border is about the same length.
“The first was the illegal takeover of the Crimean Peninsula and the ensuing war in eastern Ukraine, and the second was the hacking of the US Democratic Party in the run-up to the presidential election”, von Loringhoven continues.
Arndt Freytag von Loringhoven said the events of 2014 in Ukraine were a watershed in this development and that is why various bodies have been set up and are being set up both within NATO and within the EU, as well as in Finland.
NATO is in action openly with the Hybrid CoE by October 2017
The EU and NATO have teamed up in Europe’s far north to fight hybrid threats from “tweets to tanks.” A new center of excellence focuses on resilience to menaces from little green men to huge humanitarian catastrophes – October 3, 2017
2018:
The Hybrid Center is trying to keep up the image of being a think-tank
“One of the central tasks of the hybrid center is to articulate how different weaknesses — such as a poorly protected electrical grid or a vaguely written law — can be exploited in unforeseen ways by an adversary and then to share the best ways to defend against such attacks. In this vein, the hybrid center is more of an in-house think tank than a task force dedicated to debunking propaganda or tracking hackers in cyberspace.
“Our job is to focus on the phenomenon itself,” Jukka Savolainen, the director of a unit within the center dedicated to analyzing vulnerabilities, told FP. “We’re not pinpointing individual targets or companies or actors. It’s not about an individual case. It’s about identifying the pattern.” –Foreign policy jANUARY 18, 2018
The Russophobia starts to escalate, Atlantic Council, social media accounts mentioned
IS: The hybrid center got a preview of things to come immediately upon its launch. A website with a similar-looking logo but hosted at “.ru” – Russia – popped up, spreading fake news stories via social media.
The group, believed to be supported by Russia, even held an event in Helsinki to discuss the conflict in eastern Ukraine.
One Twitter account from the false company has been suspended but there are others, as identified by troll watchers at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab. “
This started to include all people as possible Hybrid threats.
Hints about election interference, no facts presented – the ordinary people are left without knowledge
“Coercive and subversive activity to confuse, complicate and hinder decision-making processes has increased. Elections have been interfered with in manners that are not appropriate,” he said, also identifying the attempts to steer migration flows during the ongoing migration crisis as means to apply political pressure.
Timo Soini HelsinkiTimes 12.4.2022
Perhaps it would be better to ask who is doing election interference.
The interference or fraud has never been shown and proven to the people of the World by the Mainstream Media.
Dr. Shivas historical lawsuit from 2020 proved it was the US government:
“The Secretary State of Massachusetts – which deleted over 1 million ballot images I sought to audit my own 2020 U.S. Republican Primary election”. More:
Winbackfreedom.com This case has escalated into something unbelievable, and it’s affecting ordinary people.
The Establishment is creating fear and uncertainty by keeping up the discussion of some “others” doing “hybrid influencing”
It’s like kids blaming each other and we, ordinary people are listening to it.
We should stop the Establishment, they are distracting, and confusing us.
Hybrid CoE in 2022
“Stoltenberg described how difficult it is to combat these “disguised intentions” even though they’ve been around, he pointed out, at least since the days of the legendary Trojan Horse.
Hybrid threats are a “mixture of military and non-military means of aggression, a combination of covert and overt operations and measures,” he explained, “everything from propaganda, from disinformation to actually the use of irregular forces, from tweets to tanks. Sometimes soldiers in uniform, sometimes out of uniform, sometimes in cyberspace and sometimes things that happen at our border.”
It has been considered if NATO should add a core task to its mission: Ranging from cyber to disinformation and climate change, hybrid threats.
This has been a very convenient development for NATO to get right next to Russia by doing “good”.
When you change things slowly, people get used to the idea and there won’t be massive movements on the streets.
Prisoner of conscience in the Lenin Museum
Ordinary people as Hybrid threats
–Clingendael-22.6.2022 writes there are state and non-state actors conduct influence activities.
Non-state actors can mean the Not-So-Obvious-Establishment or ordinary “dangerous” people.
Hasn’t it always been like this, in war and peace?
“Hybrid influencers” have been gossiping at the castle ball, spying, talking, writing letters to a friend to another country, messengers riding horses, delivering news to a king. There’s been wiretapping and nosy phone central ladies.
Remember “LOOSE LIPS, SINK SHIPS”
The Establishment and Mainstream Media are keeping people misinformed. Does someone still think there are countries that aren’t spying?
Inventing and naming this phenomenon as some kind of new threat to people’s existence is fearmongering. Why don’t we just use the old word spying, bad-talking, dirty and corrupt politics.
The only difference is this action is out in the open now. Hybrid influencing is just opinions. People have the right to talk about their opinions.
People’s opinions are available to other people, masses of people because of the internet.
There are lots of good things that can be passed to other people through the internet: true information to get wisdom and clarity.
We are all influencers.
Is it the Establishment who is afraid.
Join Dr. Shiva in truthfreedomhealth.com to unite with working people for Truth Freedom and Health!
